The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Identify hazards and implement general readiness actions
|
|
All emergenciesand hazards to enterprise products, personnel and assets, natural resources and environment are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Input of managers and stakeholders is sought in identifying potential emergencies and developing a risk register Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate authoritiesandemergency agencies are identified and liaised with to identify potential risks Completed |
Evidence:
|
On-facility and external monitoring and warning systems provide sufficient time to allow risk management contingency plan or loss minimisation strategy to be implemented or accessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Labour, materials, equipment and liaison procedures with emergency agencies sufficient to implement the contingency plan are determined and acquired Completed |
Evidence:
|
Rosters or shifts and contact telephone numbers of staff and emergency agencies are maintained and periodically updated with version control Completed |
Evidence:
|
Equipment and resources needed to minimise, remove or deal with threats and emergencies are marked and kept operational Completed |
Evidence:
|
External specialists are briefed on management policies and priorities Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop contingency plans and emergency procedures
|
|
Contingency plans are developed that address risks in consultation with experts, if required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency procedures are developed to address a range of possible emergency situations in consultation with experts, if required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Actions to be taken during incidents and emergencies are prioritised and documented, checks made and all legal requirements are met Completed |
Evidence:
|
Practical drills are undertaken to test contingency plans and emergency procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Costs and benefits of contingency plans or emergency procedures are evaluated and refined, if necessary Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement risk management contingency plans and emergency procedures
|
|
Copies of specific contingency plans and emergency procedures are lodged with relevant authorities and emergency agencies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Specific risks and severity of incidents are identified and appropriate risk management contingency plans selected Completed |
Evidence:
|
Staff and resources are mobilised and areas of responsibility confirmed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Professional or external assistance is obtained, appropriate to the complexity of the emergencies and financial risk Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency procedures are undertaken and liaison with emergency agencies maintained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Loss minimisation is maintained until risk has passed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency debrief is undertaken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Personnel and resources required for post-incident activities are identified and supported Completed |
Evidence:
|
Improve the contingency plans
|
|
Responses to threats and emergencies are monitored in consultation with appropriate authorities and emergency agencies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Overall performance of the contingency plan is regularly analysed for currency and functionality to ensure business stability and profitability Completed |
Evidence:
|
Results of regular analysis are documented promptly and appropriately reported to managers and key personnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information on alternative risk management strategies is assessed to determine relevance and possible application in existing or potential situations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Innovations are tested on-site to determine their suitability and adaptability to individual circumstances Completed |
Evidence:
|
Innovation benefits and costs are assessed and decisions made on adoption Completed |
Evidence:
|
Management is briefed on outcomes and recommendations made for improvements Completed |
Evidence:
|